Berlin, Germany (Welttexpress). Illegal immigration: An estimated 14 per cent of illegal immigrants in the USA are miraculously already registered for the presidential elections. A rogue who thinks evil of it. But why are the neoliberal ‘elites’ in Europe also doggedly promoting mass immigration from foreign cultures? Viktor Orbán has provided an interesting explanation.
A recently published viralvideoi reports on the Heritage Foundation’s Oversight Project and has revealed that 14 per cent of illegal immigrants in an apartment complex in the US state of Georgia have admitted to being registered voters. The undercover footage, released by journalist Carlos Arellano on 31 July, already had 39.3 million views as of 2:13pm on 2 August.
🚨NON-CITIZENS REGISTERED IN GA🚨
— Oversight Project (@OversightPR) July 31, 2024
Footage obtained by @realmuckraker shows numerous non-citizens admitting to being registered voters.
A staggering 14% of the non-citizens spoken to admitted to being registered to voters. pic.twitter.com/0p38irDBZH
The video shows numerous migrants, none of whom are citizens of the United States, whose registration as voters for the presidential election has nevertheless been officially confirmed. This confirms the long-held suspicion by Republicans of organised election fraud by so-called progressive NGOs with close ties to the Democrats.
With an estimated 339,000 non-US citizens in Georgia, applying the 14 per cent figure to the entire state suggests that over 47,000 mostly illegal immigrants could be registered voters. This figure is particularly alarming given that Joe Biden ‘won’ the 2020 presidential election in Georgia by less than 12,000 votes.
It is also interesting that the Heritage Foundation was unable to find these people in the basic document, namely the Georgia voter rolls, when researching by name, which strongly indicates the use of forged identity documents and false address information. The Oversight Project, which promotes election integrity, has referred the case to the appropriate law enforcement authorities in Georgia.
The almost 40 million views of the revelatory video within two days show the profound impact these findings about the preparation of a gigantic election fraud against Donald Trump have had on the population. At the same time, everything points to how easily the almost non-existent controls in the USA can be tricked and the election results manipulated.
In Europe, however, it is much more difficult, if not impossible, to vote as an illegal immigrant. Nevertheless, even on this side of the ‘big pond’, the EU and the governments of most member states promote mass immigration under various false pretences. And many people are wondering why. Viktor Orbán has an answer that is not so easy to dismiss.
In a speech at the Tusványos Festival in Romania on 30 July, the Hungarian Prime Minister focused on the irreconcilable ideological differences between Eastern and Western Europe, with immigration being one of the main points of conflict for him. Orbán not only rejects the Western view of this problem, but also sees an ideology behind it that aims to completely undermine the nation state. He said: ‘Westerners believe that nation states no longer exist. Therefore, they deny that there is a common culture and a public morality based on the nation state. In the West, there is no longer any public morality, as you could see yesterday at the opening ceremony of the Olympic Games. They also think differently about migration. They don’t see migration as a threat or a problem, but as a means of eliminating the ethnic homogeneity that forms the basis of a nation. This is the core of the progressive liberal international concept. That is why they do not recognise the absurdity of their actions.’
He explained that this contrast between East and West manifests itself in wars and population movements. While hundreds of thousands of Christians are killing each other in Eastern Europe, ‘in Western Europe we are letting in hundreds of thousands of people from a foreign civilisation, which is absurd from our Central European point of view.’
According to Orbán, this dramatic ideological divide is no secret. He explained that the EU’s documents and policy papers show that the clear aim is to overcome the nation state. He stated verbatim:
‘The point is that all the power and sovereignty of the states should be transferred to the EU in Brussels. This is the logic behind all important measures. In their minds, the nation is a historical or temporary formation of the 18th and 19th centuries; as it came, so it can go. In the western part of Europe, they are already in a post-national state. It is not just a politically different situation, but a new mental sense of space.’
Orbán emphasised that the Hungarian perspective is different and that is why his government is taking measures to ensure a resilient social structure. The first step is to combat Hungary’s demographic decline. He noted that progress has been made in this area in recent years, but acknowledged that there has been a standstill and new measures need to be taken.
‘By 2035, Hungary should be demographically self-sustaining. There is no question of replacing the population with migration. Western experience shows that when there are more guests than owners, the home is no longer a home. This risk should not be taken here,’ said Orbán.
He went on to note that far from all people in the West are happy with the demographic changes in their countries, and in many cases there are strong majorities against continued mass immigration. This has led to a sharp increase in the suppression of dissent and increasingly undemocratic tendencies in Western countries.
Ultimately, this post-national situation in the West has dramatic political consequences that are shaking democracy. Societies are becoming increasingly resistant to migration, gender wars and globalism. This is increasingly creating political problems between ‘elites’ and the people, between elitism and populism. This is a dominant phenomenon in Western politics today, Orbán continued. The elites were condemning the people because they were supposedly drifting to the right. The people’s feelings and ideas are labelled as xenophobia, homophobia and nationalism. The people, in turn, accuse the elites of not caring about what is important to them, but of sinking into thoughtless globalism.
As a result, the elites and the people cannot agree to work together. He could name many countries where this is the case. In conclusion, Orbán posed a rhetorical question that many people in this country are also asking themselves:
‘But if the people and the elites cannot agree to work together, how can we speak of a representative democracy? Because on the one hand we have an elite that does not want to represent the people and is proud of not wanting to, and on the other hand we have a people that demands to be represented but is not represented.’
