Berlin, Federal Republic of Germany (Weltexpress). Huge profits from put options thanks to 9/11. Israelis dancing for joy whilst filming the burning WTC towers. Claim: 9/11 was “the implementation of plans” that “had already been hatched by Zionists in the 1970s to ensure that the US would wage Israel’s wars against the Arabs”.
One of the many oddities surrounding 9/11 that were never investigated was the dramatic rise in ‘put options’, which implies suspicious prior knowledge of the terrorist attack on the World Trade Centre (WTC). From 6 September onwards, put options were being used on the New York Stock Exchange to bet on falling share prices, particularly of companies that would be adversely affected by the 9/11 disaster. As no one else had inside knowledge of the impending tragedy, the put options were cheap, and following the terrorist attack, the leverage stood at 25. This means that the as yet unknown buyers of the put options were able to pocket the sum of 25 million US dollars for every million US dollars they had bet on 12 September.
Probably the best academic source on this subject is a study by the financial economist Allen M. Poteshman of the University of Illinois (Allen M. Poteshman, ‘Unusual Option Market Activity and the Terrorist Attacks of 11 September 2001’). In it, the author examines options trading, focusing on American Airlines (AMR) and United Airlines (UAL), as well as an airline index and the S&P 500 stock market index, in the days immediately preceding 9/11. His finding is remarkable: “There were unusually high volumes of put option purchases …, which are consistent with the hypothesis that informed investors were trading on the basis of prior knowledge”.
At the time, malicious rumours claimed that the trail of the buy orders led to Israel. Officially, investigations into the identity of the put option buyers reportedly failed due to applicable laws regarding the protection of financial confidentiality. In other cases, however, this law is interpreted very liberally by the US tax authority, the IRS.
Speaking of Israel and 9/11, one is reminded of the group of ‘dancing Israelis’ who filmed the collapsing WTC towers with obvious delight. According to the official FBI account, on 11 September 2001 in New Jersey, witnesses observed five Israeli employees of the removal firm Urban Moving Systems filming the burning WTC towers from the opposite bank of the Hudson River, whilst laughing loudly, high-fiving one another and appearing cheerful. A local resident alerted the police.
The men were arrested that afternoon in their company van. Israeli passports, cash, photographs of the towers and a craft knife were found in their possession.
The FBI allegedly investigated them for weeks regarding possible prior knowledge or links to intelligence services. According to the findings, they were harmless and were all deported to Israel in early November 2001 for visa offences. Whenever the trail leads to Israel, criminal investigations quickly hit a brick wall, whether the case involves a terrorist attack that shocks the entire nation or the no less shocking organised blackmail of the political elite in Washington over child abuse.
Jeffrey Epstein’s business model consisted of supplying ‘fresh meat’ to influential but perverse US politicians and VIPs, and then documenting the child abuse for his Mossad clients using hidden cameras. Alongside the huge sums of money provided by the Zionist lobby as campaign donations to key members of the US Congress, the compromising Epstein videos could be the other part of the explanation as to why virtually the entire US Congress, along with the US government – regardless of who is president – is deeply in the pocket of the extremist Zionists in Israel.
When Donald Trump was campaigning for his second term in 2024, he promised that, as US President, he would launch a new – this time genuine – investigation into the events of 9/11, with witnesses testifying under oath. But since then, Trump has forgotten this promise too, probably because too many leads point to Israel. Trump’s public assurance of a thorough investigation into the crimes of the Mossad agent Epstein and his ‘clients’ – who had visited the paedophile’s private Caribbean island on Epstein’s Boeing, christened the ‘Lolita Express’ – also falls into the same category.
Just in time for the 25th anniversary, the political scientist Kees van der Pijl has announced a new book, *Israel and 9/11*. In it, based on his research, he concludes that the official 9/11 narrative – which remains the accepted version to this day, namely that the attacks were carried out by al-Qaeda under Osama bin Laden – has been refuted, and that “Israelis and Zionists within the US government” were the true perpetrators.
In the latest issue of the news magazine Hintergrund (10 September 2026), van der Pijl presented some of his research findings in an article entitled “The 11 September attacks – 25 years on”. These are accurately reflected in the article’s subtitle: “The official conspiracy theory has been refuted. The aim is to identify the true perpetrators and their motives.” In doing so, the author first delves deeply into the criminal history of the Zionist terrorists.
According to van der Pijl’s research, the plan for the ‘US war on (Arab) terror’ was not devised by George W. Bush in Washington in 2001, but had already been developed as a concept in Israel as early as 1979.
Van der Pijl writes that, from 1979 onwards, the Likud party, led by the Zionist terrorists Menachem Begin and Yitzhak Shamir, openly advocated that the US should wage Israel’s wars under the banner of a ‘war on terror’.
As early as five years later, in 1984, a “high-level US-Israeli conference” took place in Washington. There, the view was put forward that military action by the US against Israel’s neighbours would be justified “should a major terrorist attack occur – a ‘Big Bang’ – which went far beyond an ordinary aeroplane hijacking”. In the years that followed, Israeli officials made it clear “that this would have to be a terrorist attack on the US itself”. As evidence, van der Pijl cites the 1986 volume “Terrorism. How the West Can Win”, edited by Benjamin Netanyahu.
For Van der Pijl, 11 September was “the implementation of plans” “that had already been forged in the late 1970s, after the Israeli leadership began to doubt its ability to survive another major war with its Arab neighbours on its own”.
Note:
See the articles
- The Unanswered Questions of Ground Zero – Series: 25 Years After 9/11 (Part 1/6) by Rainer Rupp
- Just a few seconds’ deviation from a stone in free fall – Series: 25 years after 9/11 (Part 2/6) by Rainer Rupp
- “How can aircraft-grade aluminium penetrate this steel?” – Series: 25 years after 9/11 (Part 3/6) by Rainer Rupp
in WELTEXPRESS.
